TL;DR
- Aleksib’s removal follows consecutive tournament failures including 12th place at IEM Cologne
- G2 faces unique roster constraints with high-value players limiting replacement options
- The IGL market offers three viable free agents with distinct strengths and weaknesses
- Team’s leadership instability dates back through multiple IGL changes and roster experiments
- Strategic IGL selection must balance tactical expertise with star player management skills

The leadership carousel continues spinning for G2 Esports as their Counter-Strike: Global Offensive lineup faces yet another captaincy shakeup. This marks the organization’s continued struggle to find stable in-game leadership that can harness their formidable individual talent.
Following a series of underwhelming tournament performances throughout 2022, Aleksi “Aleksib” Virolainen has been officially removed from his IGL position. The decision gained momentum after back-to-back defeats against Movistar Riders and ENCE during IEM Cologne, though speculation about his departure had circulated for weeks prior. G2’s historical difficulty securing effective shot-callers combines with the limited pool of available tactical leaders to create a challenging recruitment landscape.
On July 16, Aleksib confirmed his benching through social media channels, coming shortly after G2’s disappointing 12th-place exit from IEM Cologne 2022. Originally emerging from tier-two competition, Aleksib first gained prominence with the memorable ENCE lineup in 2018. His career progression included captaining OG’s inaugural roster before joining G2 at the beginning of 2022 through a trade that sent former IGL Nemanja “nexa” Isaković in the opposite direction.
Hey everyone, I've been allowed by G2 to explore my options elsewhere.
Feel free to reach out to @G2Mayne if you have any interest.
More to follow.
— NAVI Aleksi (@AleksibCSGO) July 16, 2022
Why Aleksib Was Removed from G2 Esports
While G2 management hasn’t provided explicit reasoning for Aleksib’s removal, the evidence strongly points toward deteriorating competitive results and fundamental leadership compatibility issues. Teams often make IGL changes when tactical direction fails to translate into consistent tournament success.
The meager $16,000 share from IEM Cologne’s $1 million prize pool represents just one low point in a season filled with underperformance. The squad previously faltered at IEM Dallas and delivered particularly disappointing results at the Antwerp Major. These outcomes starkly contrast with their February performance where they secured $180,000 with a runner-up finish at IEM Katowice.

This situation echoes G2’s previous captaincy instability, including the surprising removal of Nemanja “nexa” Isaković merely two months after their second-place Stockholm Major finish. Earlier experiments with Richard “shox” Papillon as primary caller also failed to produce desired outcomes.
G2’s roster construction presents additional complications for making personnel changes. Audric “JACKZ” Jug maintains the longest tenure on the team, while cousins Nikola “NiKo” Kovač and Nemanja “huNter-” Kovač likely prefer remaining together. Ilya “m0NESY” Osipov’s reported $600,000+ buyout means management wants maximum return on their young AWPer investment. Given these constraints, the in-game leader position remains G2’s only realistic adjustment point.
Who Will Replace Aleksib as G2 IGL?
With Aleksib’s exit, G2 enters the challenging market for tactical leaders. Current conditions offer limited options, forcing G2 to choose between available free agents or attempting to acquire IGLs from other organizations. If pursuing the free agent route, these candidates represent the most viable possibilities.
Rasmus “HooXi” Nielsen
The former Copenhagen Flames captain presents an intriguing option for G2’s leadership vacancy. HooXi guided his previous team through their remarkable 2022 ascent, culminating in a top-eight placement at the Antwerp Major. As one of only two Copenhagen Flames members not yet signed to new teams, his availability makes him a logical consideration for G2’s search.
Alexander “ALEX” McMeekin
Since his May benching from Fnatic, ALEX has maintained relative silence, though he presumably plans to continue his professional CSGO career. G2’s leadership needs could provide his ideal opportunity. He previously steered Fnatic during their impressive late-2021 resurgence, and his comparatively modest fragging capabilities shouldn’t hinder a roster featuring G2’s firepower.
Kirill “Boombl4” Mikhaylov
Na’Vi’s former captain represents a less conventional choice for G2, yet Boombl4 remains the most accomplished available IGL without a current team. His demonstrated ability to collaborate with elite talents like Oleksandr “s1mple” Kostyliev combined with his distinctive lurking approach introduces strategic unpredictability. Aleksib’s abrupt departure creates potential for Boombl4 to join G2, assuming his musical pursuits don’t take precedence.
The timing of this leadership transition creates both challenges and opportunities for G2’s competitive future. Teams undergoing mid-season IGL changes typically face adaptation periods where tactical systems require rebuilding from the ground up. The ideal candidate must not only implement effective strategies but also manage strong personalities within the roster.
Successful IGL integration requires balancing several critical factors: tactical innovation, player management, and adaptation to the team’s existing strengths. For organizations like G2 with established star players, the leadership selection becomes particularly crucial for maximizing individual talent while maintaining cohesive team play.
For teams navigating similar transitions, our Class Guide offers valuable insights into role specialization and team composition principles that apply across competitive gaming titles.
Action Checklist
- Evaluate candidate compatibility with existing star players and team dynamics
- Analyze tactical systems from previous teams led by potential IGLs
- Assess market availability beyond free agent pool for potential acquisitions
- Develop adaptation timeline accounting for upcoming tournament schedule
No reproduction without permission:Game Guides Online » After shock Aleksib kick, who could be the next G2 IGL? Analyzing G2 Esports' IGL crisis and potential replacements following Aleksib's departure from the CSGO roster
