TL;DR
- Astralis co-founder Nikolaj Nyholm planned competitive shooter venture targeting CS:GO and Valorant
- Project faced setbacks with Minh Le’s departure but continued as Scattershot Project B
- Astralis faces financial challenges despite recent competitive successes
- Brand consolidation strategy aims to leverage organizational reputation for sponsorships
- Nyholm’s venture capital background provides strategic advantage in crowded market

Nikolaj Nyholm, the former Astralis CEO and current chairman of Astralis Group, initiated plans to secure funding for developing a competitive first-person shooter designed specifically for esports tournaments. According to industry insiders familiar with the negotiations, the project aimed to create a title that could compete directly with established giants in the tactical shooter space.
The venture officially registered in late September under the name Scattershot Ltd., but experienced significant disruption when Minh Le—the original creator of Counter-Strike 1.6—withdrew from the partnership. Le’s departure occurred as the veteran programmer focused his attention on completing development of Plan 8, the upcoming title from Pearl Abyss, developers of Black Desert Online.
Initial uncertainty surrounded Nyholm’s commitment to continuing development of what was envisioned as a premium first-person shooter rivaling Counter-Strike: Global Offensive and Riot Games’ Valorant. However, Nyholm demonstrated continued interest by filing registration documents on October 7 for Scattershot Project B, establishing it as a subsidiary entity under the Scattershot Limited umbrella.

Corporate filings reveal Nyholm serves as the sole director of the new entity and maintains controlling ownership with 75% of company shares. While Scattershot Ltd. reported minimal initial capital of just 100 GBP, Nyholm strategically structured Project B to ensure he retained majority voting control. Counter-Strike co-creator Le has publicly confirmed his complete separation from all Scattershot-related initiatives.
Astralis faces underlying business instability despite achieving competitive success by winning ESL Pro League Season 12 in September. This victory provided temporary positive momentum but hasn’t resolved deeper organizational challenges.
The organization’s consolidation strategy involves rebranding both their League of Legends squad (formerly Origen) and professional FIFA Esports roster (Future FC) under the unified Astralis brand identity. This approach likely aims to leverage the organization’s established reputation as figurative collateral when negotiating sponsorship agreements and partnership deals.
Nyholm’s exploration of alternative business avenues represents prudent diversification given Astralis’s declining market performance since its December 2019 initial public offering. The company has experienced significant valuation erosion despite maintaining competitive relevance in esports tournaments.

Stock performance metrics reveal concerning trends, with share prices plummeting from an initial offering price approaching 9 Danish Krone to just 4.77 DKK by October 9—representing nearly a 50% decline in market capitalization. This financial context makes Nyholm’s external venture pursuits strategically understandable from a business perspective.
Introducing another tactical first-person shooter into an increasingly saturated market landscape presents substantial execution challenges. However, Nyholm’s established track record of successful investments during his tenure with Danish venture capital firm Sunstone Capital suggests investors and esports enthusiasts should not underestimate the experienced business leader’s capabilities.
The competitive shooter segment represents one of esports’ most crowded and demanding categories. New entrants must overcome significant barriers including established player communities, sophisticated esports infrastructures, and deeply entrenched competitive ecosystems surrounding incumbent titles.
Success in this space requires not only exceptional gameplay mechanics but also robust competitive features, comprehensive spectator tools, and sustainable monetization strategies. For guidance on optimizing your gameplay in similar tactical shooters, consult our comprehensive Battlefield 6 Complete Guide for advanced strategies.
Nyholm’s venture capital background provides valuable perspective on the investment requirements and timeline for building a competitive esports title. Industry analysis suggests successful shooter launches typically require 18-36 months development cycles and $20-50 million funding rounds to achieve competitive viability.
Market differentiation strategies for new shooters often focus on innovative game modes, advanced spectator features, or unique mechanical innovations that distinguish them from established competitors.
Action Checklist
- Analyze market saturation and competitive landscape before entering crowded gaming segments
- Evaluate key personnel commitments and potential conflicts with ongoing projects
- Assess financial runway and funding requirements for competitive game development
- Review corporate structure and voting control arrangements in new ventures
- Monitor public company performance metrics when evaluating leadership capabilities
No reproduction without permission:Game Guides Online » Astralis chairman tried to create a new competitor to CSGO Astralis co-founder's ambitious esports shooter project and strategic business moves analyzed
