Destiny loses Twitch partnership for “encouraging violence”

TL;DR

  • Destiny lost his Twitch partnership for statements supporting violence against protesters during civil unrest
  • The platform’s legal department handled the revocation, suggesting potential liability concerns rather than pure TOS violations
  • Community reactions highlighted inconsistencies in Twitch’s enforcement of violence-related policies
  • Content creators must understand the distinction between Terms of Service breaches and legal liability risks
  • Streamers should implement content review processes to avoid similar partnership terminations

Destiny ban

Steven Kenneth “Destiny” Bonnell II, a prominent streaming personality, experienced partnership revocation from Twitch following allegations of promoting violent conduct. This development sent shockwaves through the streaming ecosystem, highlighting platform accountability measures.

As a versatile content creator boasting more than 576,000 platform followers, Destiny built his reputation primarily through League of Legends gameplay, though recent broadcasts frequently featured him in the Just Chatting category engaging with viewers.

While Twitch maintained official silence regarding the partnership decision, Destiny publicly disclosed receiving formal email notification from the platform indicating termination due to unspecified instances of “encouraging violence” during his live sessions.

Why was Destiny’s Twitch partnership removed?

Initially, Destiny’s audience expressed confusion about which specific comments prompted platform intervention. Through community investigation, viewers identified the problematic broadcast segment that likely precipitated the partnership removal.

Destiny violence racism partnership

“The rioting needs to fucking stop,” Destiny asserted. “If that means white redneck militia dudes mowing down dipshit protesters that think they can torch buildings at 10 PM, at this point they have my fucking blessing. Holy shit, this shit needs to stop. It needed to stop a long time ago.”

These inflammatory comments generated divided audience responses, with many ultimately supporting Twitch’s disciplinary measures. Some community members interpreted Destiny’s statements as endorsing “mass murder,” while others criticized his excessively aggressive phrasing despite agreeing with his perspective on civil unrest. Numerous followers suggested he should have expressed these views privately, while additional critics identified potentially racist implications that would persist regardless of context.

Certain supporters expressed frustration about Destiny’s partnership loss when other broadcasters made comparable statements without significant repercussions. This includes Hasanabi, who advocated to “kill those motherfuckers in the street” referencing “capitalist” property owners. Hasanabi subsequently clarified his remarks referred exclusively to video game scenarios rather than real-world violence.

It’s really shitty of @twitch to threaten to remove partnership from @GazeWithin for “encouragement of violence” when you have clips of @hasanthehun doing the same thing but they instead send him a birthday present. https://t.co/6t63lt8bnx https://t.co/N5Yz0tJgCi @Slasher pic.twitter.com/mxoT1zsLWb

— Steven Bonnell (@DestinyGGChat) September 11, 2020

Regardless of audience support for Destiny’s perspective on addressing looting, his statements explicitly endorsed lethal force against property destroyers, prompting Twitch’s decisive response.

After identifying the partnership revocation cause, the streaming community questioned why Twitch didn’t implement suspension or banning if the violation warranted partnership termination. Many observers noted Twitch’s legal department executed the de-partnering, indicating his comments might not technically breach platform Terms of Service but potentially created legal exposure for the company.

Destiny’s platform history includes previous disciplinary actions, including temporary bans for nudity displays and homophobic language usage.

Content creators operating under partnership agreements must recognize the critical distinction between Terms of Service violations and statements creating legal liability for platforms. While TOS breaches typically involve content guidelines, legal department interventions address potential real-world consequences that could expose companies to litigation or regulatory scrutiny.

Streamers should implement pre-broadcast content review protocols and maintain awareness of current social contexts when discussing sensitive topics. Many successful creators employ delay systems and moderation teams to intercept potentially problematic statements before they reach public audiences.

Understanding platform risk assessment frameworks helps content creators navigate the complex landscape of acceptable discourse while maintaining partnership status and revenue streams.

Action Checklist

  • Implement 30-second broadcast delay with moderator oversight for live content
  • Create content review checklist covering violence endorsement, hate speech, and legal liability risks
  • Establish emergency response protocol for potentially problematic statements during live broadcasts
  • Regularly audit past content for statements that might be re-evaluated under evolving platform policies

No reproduction without permission:Game Guides Online » Destiny loses Twitch partnership for “encouraging violence” Understanding Twitch's partnership policies and the consequences of violating community guidelines for content creators