Game dev under fire for mandatory “Sauna sessions” with staff

A deep dive into the controversial sauna requirement at Spectrum Studios, exploring workplace ethics and creative authenticity in game development

The Core Controversy: Mandatory Naked Sauna Sessions

An unusual employment prerequisite has ignited a firestorm within the game development community, centering on a Polish studio’s demand for team immersion through communal sauna use. The issue transcends typical workplace debates, touching on bodily autonomy, professional boundaries, and the limits of creative research.

Jacek Piorkowski, the Creative Director at Spectrum Studios, finds himself at the eye of this storm. Industry professionals are questioning his stipulation that developers participate in nude sauna sessions as a fundamental component of their role. This requirement surfaced not through internal memos, but on the public stage of LinkedIn, turning a hiring discussion into a viral case study on workplace norms.

Patryk Suchy, a Lead Recruiter at 8bit, served as the initial whistleblower. His LinkedIn post explicitly called out the practice, stating, “This dude, a creative director, requires NAKED SAUNA SESSIONS as a part of work in his studio.” Suchy’s post included damning screenshot evidence of Piorkowski’s direct messages, revealing the depth of the expectation. This public shaming shifted the conversation from a private negotiation to an industry-wide examination of power dynamics.

Aleksandra Wolna, a narrative designer and writer, provided the most direct account of the interaction. After engaging with Piorkowski about potential work, she clarified her boundary: “From what you said, you consider naked sauna sessions part of the work responsibilities in your studio. I told you that was a dealbreaker.” Her response highlights a critical moment where a developer clearly articulated a personal and professional limit, refusing to compromise comfort for employment. This stance garnered significant support from peers who recognized the inherent coercion in such a demand.

The controversy is compounded by the studio’s official stance, as found in a public job advertisement for an Art Director. The ad explicitly states that attending sauna sessions is “not negotiable” because the “entire team needs to understand the product.” This formalizes the requirement, moving it from a director’s eccentric preference to a documented studio policy. For job seekers, this creates an impossible choice: submit to an invasive condition or forfeit a career opportunity. It raises immediate questions about compliance with labor laws and codes of conduct in the European Union, where Spectrum Studios is based.

Jacek Piorkowski’s Defense: Authenticity in Creative Process

Facing intense criticism, Piorkowski has mounted a defense rooted in a specific philosophy of authentic creation. His argument centers on the belief that genuine experience is irreplaceable for crafting compelling fiction, especially for a game so deeply themed around sauna culture. However, his delivery and specific demands have muddied this conceptually valid point.

Piorkowski’s core rebuttal to Wolna was blunt: “You had a lot of time to prove me wrong. To write a scene in a sauna without being in a sauna… Instead, we are wasting time on social media.” This reflects a deep-seated conviction that firsthand sensory immersion is a prerequisite for quality writing. He doubled down by citing past success: “My narrative girls had to go to sauna with me to come up with amazing script for proof of concept… I absolutely adore the fact that they could use their sauna experience to write awesome scenes.” This anecdote is pivotal—it frames the requirement not as a personal whim, but as a proven method integral to his studio’s creative pipeline.

His justification extends to a rejection of academic or secondary research. He stated, “We’re doing a game about Sauna Sessions. I don’t want to waste my time to explain what’s the difference between Ruska Bania or Dry Sauna. You have to feel it.” The phrase “feel it” is the cornerstone of his argument, prioritizing embodied knowledge over intellectual understanding. To accommodate potential discomfort, he offered to “even organize female only event,” suggesting an awareness of the sensitive nature of the requirement, though not a willingness to abandon it.

Piorkowski also ventured into practical and health justifications, revealing a detailed, if controversial, engagement with sauna etiquette. He explained, “If you knew anything about it, wetness level inside Bania or Steam one is around 90%. So, towel is extremely wet after few seconds. So, you can still do it, but it may result with fungal infection.” His conclusion was direct: “You should be naked in Bania or Steam and with or without towel in dry one.” This shift from creative rationale to hygiene advice further blurs the line between a director’s guidance and an inappropriate imposition on personal behavior.

**Common Mistake to Avoid: Conflating Method with Mandate.** Piorkowski’s fundamental error lies in transforming a suggested creative method—immersive research—into an enforced, non-negotiable condition of employment. Best practice involves offering research opportunities, budgets, and support (e.g., sending writers to relevant locations), not mandating specific, physically intimate activities. A studio can champion authenticity without violating personal boundaries by providing options, not ultimatums.

The Game: “Sauna Sessions” and Its Ambitious Vision

To understand the intensity of this conflict, one must examine the project at its heart. “Sauna Sessions” is not a minor title but a self-described “groundbreaking” fusion of major genres, placing sauna culture not just as a setting, but as the core gameplay mechanic.

The game’s vision, as detailed in the job ad, is staggeringly ambitious: “a mix of Life is Strange (Narrative), Final Fantasy (story, characters), Heart of Darkness (adventure levels with dog), The Tourist (exploration and questing) and THPS2 (tricks and specials).” This cocktail of narrative depth, character development, adventure, exploration, and skill-based gameplay suggests a AAA-scale project with a highly unconventional soul. The sauna is the linchpin holding these disparate elements together.

The protagonist’s role is key. The “Main character will be a saunamaster and will be in charge of performing in various saunas (smells, music, choreography, everything).” This transforms the sauna from a passive environment into an active stage. Gameplay would likely involve mastering different sauna rituals (Ruska Bania vs. Dry Sauna), understanding their sensory components, and perhaps performing these rituals for clients or as part of a larger narrative. This level of detail explains Piorkowski’s obsession with authenticity—the player’s immersion relies on the developers’ immersion.

**Practical Tip for Developers: Research Alternatives.** When working on a niche subject, exhaustive research is crucial, but mandates are not. A team developing a game like “Sauna Sessions” could ethically achieve immersion through: 1) Documentaries and ethnographic interviews with real saunamasters. 2) Visits to public sauna facilities where clothing policies are clear and consensual. 3) Sensory workshops focusing on smell, heat, and sound without the requirement of nudity. 4) Hiring cultural consultants from the sauna tradition. These methods provide deep understanding while respecting team members’ diverse comfort levels and personal beliefs.

Japanese game studio forces applicants to draw in front of them to avoid AI

Epic Games boss thinks Steam’s AI warning “makes no sense”

Steam ban leaves indie horror game on brink of failure

Broader Implications: Workplace Boundaries and Creative Freedom

The Spectrum Studios saga is not an isolated incident but a stark indicator of persistent issues in the creative industries. It forces a conversation about where the line falls between passionate dedication to a project and the creation of a hostile or coercive work environment.

**Legal and HR Red Flags:** From a compliance perspective, several alarms sound. Mandating nudity in a work context, especially without a clear, separate, and consensual research agreement, risks violating harassment policies and labor laws pertaining to a safe work environment. The power imbalance is acute: a job applicant or employee may feel compelled to agree to secure or retain their position, voiding any claim of true consent. The offer of a “female only event” does not mitigate this; it merely segregates the potential violation. HR departments in mature studios would likely classify such a requirement as an unacceptable conduct risk.

**When Research Crosses the Line:** Game development often requires specialized research. Writers visit locations, artists study anatomy, and designers deconstruct mechanics. The principle is sound. The problem arises when the research activity is: 1) **Intrinsically Personal:** Involving nudity, extreme physical activity, or violation of personal beliefs. 2) **Mandatory:** Presented as a condition of employment rather than an optional opportunity. 3) **Unrelated to Core Duties:** A narrative designer might need to understand sauna ambiance, but do they need to experience it naked to write dialogue? The link must be direct and justified.

**Protecting Developer Well-being:** The backlash from figures like Wolna and Suchy underscores a growing industry intolerance for practices that compromise dignity. Developers, especially those early in their careers, are increasingly aware of their rights and more willing to speak out. Studios that fail to respect these boundaries risk not only legal action but also severe reputational damage, making it harder to attract top talent. A culture of respect and optional immersion is more sustainable and productive than one built on coercion.

**Optimization Tip for Advanced Studios: Formalize Your Research Ethics.** Leading studios preempt such controversies by establishing clear research ethics guidelines. These policies define: what constitutes necessary research, how budgets are allocated for it, the requirement for voluntary participation, and procedures for accommodating opt-outs. For example, a studio making a game about mountain climbing might offer a funded trip to the Alps for interested team members, while providing comprehensive video/documentary resources for those who decline. This formalizes support for authenticity without imposing it.

Actionable Insights for Developers and Studios

This controversy provides concrete lessons for both individuals navigating the job market and studios shaping their culture. Moving forward requires clear frameworks and assertive communication.

**For Developers Facing Unconventional Requirements:**
1. **Assess the Direct Link:** Ask how the activity directly translates to your specific tasks. Is it essential for a programmer, or primarily for narrative/art?
2. **Propose Alternatives:** Follow Wolna’s lead by stating your boundary clearly and suggesting alternative research methods you are comfortable with.
3. **Evaluate Studio Culture:** A non-negotiable, invasive requirement is a major red flag for the overall workplace culture. Consider it a window into management’s respect for employee autonomy.
4. **Document Interactions:** Keep records of job descriptions and communications that outline such requirements. This protects you and provides evidence if needed.

**For Studios Seeking Authentic Immersion:**
1. **Decouple Requirement from Employment:** Make immersive research an optional, supported benefit, not a hiring condition. Fund it separately and celebrate those who participate without penalizing those who don’t.
2. **Develop a Consent-First Model:** Any activity outside standard office work should involve explicit, written consent forms explaining the activity, its purpose, and the right to withdraw without consequence.
3. **Utilize Experts and Consultants:** Hire cultural consultants, subject matter experts, or “method actors” who consent to deep immersion as their specific job, rather than imposing it on an entire team.
4. **Foster Open Dialogue:** Create channels where employees can safely question research methods without fear of reprisal. The best ideas for ethical immersion often come from the team itself.

The goal for the industry should be to harness the power of authentic experience without sacrificing the dignity, comfort, and legal rights of the people who create our games. The path forward lies in optionality, support, and clear communication, not in mandates and controversy.

Wolna expressed thanks for the support from other developers who called out Piorkowski’s offer, in what is a truly bizarre situation.

Dexerto has reached out to Spectrum Studios for comment.

No reproduction without permission:Game Guides Online » Game dev under fire for mandatory “Sauna sessions” with staff A deep dive into the controversial sauna requirement at Spectrum Studios, exploring workplace ethics and creative authenticity in game development