TL;DR
- LEC announced NEOM as main partner for 2020 Summer Split, sponsoring Oracle Lens feature
- Broadcast talent and community expressed immediate outrage over Saudi Arabia’s human rights record
- Multiple LEC personalities voiced concerns about promoting a country with anti-LGBTQ+ laws
- Controversy revealed internal conflicts about partnership approval processes
- Incident highlights growing ethical sponsorship dilemmas in esports industry

The League of Legends European Championship (LEC) revealed NEOM as its newest primary sponsor for the 2020 Summer Split, triggering immediate and widespread condemnation from both broadcasting professionals and dedicated fans across the region.
NEOM operates as a Saudi Arabian government-backed initiative designed to create an innovative urban development spanning territory comparable to Belgium’s total area. This ambitious project promises revolutionary urban planning concepts alongside technological marvels including simulated lunar displays and autonomous aerial transportation systems.
LEC confirmed that NEOM would exclusively sponsor the “Oracle Lens” analytical tool featured during all live competitive broadcasts.
“NEOM maintains forward-looking development objectives – to enhance strategic forecasting capabilities on the LEC competitive stage, they will exclusively sponsor the Oracle Lens during live transmissions that assists competitive athletes in anticipating opponent tactical movements. Commencing from Summer Week 7 competitive matches, NEOM joins established partners including Kia, Alienware, and KitKat, finalizing the premier sponsorship portfolio for this competitive season,” the LEC organization statedwithin their official declaration.
.@NEOM joins #LEC as a main partner for Summer:https://t.co/BW1KBNnApa pic.twitter.com/3iMyvhVWxG
— LEC (@LEC) July 29, 2020
NEOM partnership criticized by LEC casters, community
While LEC organizational leadership appeared enthusiastic about their new corporate alliance, this sentiment failed to extend to on-air personalities and the broader League of Legends enthusiast base.
Numerous prominent LEC broadcasting figures rapidly expressed their disapproval regarding the sponsorship arrangement across various social media platforms. Similarly, the community response demonstrated overwhelming frustration that the LEC would consent to such a controversial business relationship.
The league I cover is now promoting a country that would kill me just for existing. Feels great.
— James ‘Stress’ O’Leary (@StressCasts) July 29, 2020
There have been many good days to be a member of the #LEC team, today is not one of those days.
— Daniel Drakos (@DanielDrakos) July 29, 2020
I am let down by the #LEC today.
— Froskurinn (@Froskurinn) July 29, 2020
The widespread criticism stems from NEOM’s direct association with Saudi Arabia, a nation internationally recognized for its problematic human rights documentation. Primary objections have concentrated specifically on Saudi Arabia’s severe legislative measures concerning LGBTQ+ rights. The country legally penalizes homosexual relationships and transgender identities, while the LEC has actively championed LGBTQ+ rights through pride-themed branding during broadcasts and digital media campaigns. The community immediately accused LEC of demonstrating contradictory values, with numerous supporters declaring they would boycott upcoming LEC viewing sessions.

Shortly following the official revelation, former League of Legends strategic coach Michael “Veteran” Archer disclosed via Twitter that LEC participating organizations possessed contractual authority to reject this partnership arrangement, but none exercised this option. Almost immediately after this assertion surfaced, G2 Esports chief executive Carlos “Ocelote” Rodriguez contradicted the statement. Ocelote further emphasized that “G2 nor myself will be accepting financial compensation derived from genocide and systematic ethnic purification,” responding to speculation that LEC competing teams might receive revenue shares from the newly established NEOM sponsorship agreement.
This isn’t true. @FNATIC
— ocelote CarlosR (@CarlosR) July 29, 2020
The LEC will feature its inaugural NEOM-sponsored analytical segment during week 7 of the2020 LEC Summer Splitcompetitive schedule.
This sponsorship controversy highlights critical ethical considerations emerging within professional esports sponsorship ecosystems. Organizations must balance financial sustainability against alignment with core community values and ethical standards. The incident demonstrates how rapidly sponsorship decisions can damage brand credibility and audience trust when perceived values conflicts arise.
For teams navigating similar sponsorship evaluations, establishing clear ethical guidelines and transparent decision-making processes can help prevent similar community relations crises. The situation underscores the importance of conducting thorough due diligence on potential partners’ human rights records and public perception.
Looking toward the future, esports organizations should consider implementing standardized ethical sponsorship frameworks that address human rights considerations, similar to those developing in traditional sports industries.
Action Checklist
- Establish clear ethical sponsorship guidelines addressing human rights considerations
- Conduct thorough due diligence on potential partners’ international human rights records
- Implement transparent community communication protocols for sponsorship announcements
- Develop crisis management strategies for potential sponsorship controversies
No reproduction without permission:Game Guides Online » LEC brings on NEOM as new partner, talent lash out against move LEC's NEOM partnership sparks community outrage over human rights concerns and ethical sponsorship conflicts
