Mousesports to play at EPICENTER Moscow after Fnatic drops out

The professional CSGO scene witnessed a familiar scenario unfold as another elite organization made a late exit from a major tournament.

Fnatic’s competitive Global Offensive division revealed through their official social media channels that they would not be competing at EPICENTER Moscow 2019. The announcement came via a formal statement posted on their Twitter account, catching many fans and analysts by surprise.

“Regrettably, we must inform our community that we will not participate in @epicentergg 2019 this December. Our organization has conducted a thorough review of our remaining competitive commitments for this year and determined this adjustment is necessary. We extend our gratitude to Epicenter for their invitation and wish all participating squads the best of luck. #AlwaysFnatic,” the team communicated.

This development echoes previous instances within the EPICENTER tournament series. Back in October 2018, mousesports similarly withdrew from competition, with organizers subsequently inviting HellRaisers to fill the vacant slot.

In an interesting turn of events, the very team that previously withdrew from EPICENTER now returns to replace Fnatic. Mousesports enters this tournament with significant momentum following their recent championship victory at the CSGO Asia Championships under the leadership of in-game leader Finn “karrigan” Andersen.

“Following @fnatic’s choice to provide their competitive roster with additional recovery time, they will not compete at EPICENTER. We have invited the European qualifier finalists, @mousesports, to take their position in the main competition,” tournament representatives confirmed.

CSGO’s Oversaturated Tournament Circuit Creates Systemic Challenges

EPICENTER Moscow represents just one example of the broader scheduling crisis affecting elite CSGO teams. Earlier in October, North American powerhouse Team Liquid similarly withdrew from IEM Beijing. Star player Jonathan “EliGE” Jablonowski openly discussed how the relentless competitive calendar had left his team experiencing both mental fatigue and physical exhaustion.

“Even after taking scheduled breaks, we return to competition only to immediately confront the chaotic scheduling landscape that defines our competitive ecosystem,” EliGE explained regarding the 2019 tournament schedule.

Player burnout has consistently plagued CSGO’s largely unregulated tournament structure. It took until 2017 for professional competitors to collectively establish August as their designated off-season, forcing organizers to acknowledge their need for recovery periods.

However, fundamental issues persist within the system. Teams often face difficult choices between maintaining competitive form and protecting player welfare, with tournament withdrawals becoming an increasingly common strategic decision.

The physical demands of international travel compound these challenges. Competing across multiple continents with significant time zone changes creates additional stress that impacts both individual performance and team cohesion.

Significant controversy emerged earlier this year when Valve announced the StarLadder Berlin Major would commence immediately following the players’ designated break period. Professional competitors and analytical experts throughout the scene criticized both Valve and StarLadder, contending that placing one of the year’s two premier tournaments right after the recovery window represented poor planning.

Although both organizations eventually adjusted the schedule to better suit competitor needs, this incident highlights the substantial disconnect that remains between tournament organizers and professional teams regarding realistic scheduling expectations.

The conflict illustrates a fundamental tension between commercial interests and athlete wellbeing. Tournament organizers face pressure to fill calendar slots and generate content, while teams must prioritize long-term player health and sustainable performance cycles.

Effective communication protocols between these stakeholders remain underdeveloped. Many teams report learning about tournament dates through public announcements rather than direct consultation, creating last-minute scheduling conflicts and forced withdrawals.

Advanced planning becomes particularly challenging when organizations operate across multiple competitive titles. Professional esports athletes often compete in back-to-back events with minimal preparation time between competitions.

Professional organizations can implement several strategic approaches to mitigate scheduling conflicts. Establishing dedicated calendar management teams helps identify potential overlaps months in advance, allowing for strategic participation decisions.

Tournament organizers should adopt transparent scheduling windows with fixed announcement dates. This allows teams to plan their competitive years with greater certainty and reduces last-minute withdrawals.

Teams benefit from developing clear participation criteria based on tournament prestige, location, and timing relative to other commitments. This systematic approach prevents overcommitment and protects player recovery periods.

Implementing mandatory breaks between international tournaments gives players time to recover from travel fatigue and adapt to new time zones.

For those managing competitive rosters, our Complete Guide to team management provides additional frameworks for balancing competition and recovery.

Strategic planning should include buffer periods around major tournaments. These windows allow for focused preparation and post-event analysis, both critical for maintaining competitive excellence throughout the season.

No reproduction without permission：Game Guides Online » Mousesports to play at EPICENTER Moscow after Fnatic drops out Understanding CSGO's tournament scheduling crisis and its impact on professional teams' performance and wellbeing