TL;DR
- Aleksib delivered a career-best performance against his former team ENCE with a 2-0 victory
- His 91.3% KAST rating and 1.61 Overpass rating demonstrate elite IGL capabilities
- The match featured highlight-reel jumping kills reminiscent of coldzera’s iconic plays
- OG’s controversial three-IGL roster strategy proved effective in high-pressure situations
- Smaller tournaments like ICE Challenge benefit from CS:GO’s competitive ecosystem
The opening weekend of professional Counter-Strike in 2020 witnessed an unforgettable showdown as Aleksi “Aleksib” Virolainen unleashed a masterclass performance against his former organization. The GG.BET ICE Challenge became the perfect venue for this highly anticipated grudge match.
While major tournaments like BLAST Premier featured marquee matchups, the London-based ICE Challenge delivered the most compelling narrative of the weekend. Aleksib systematically dismantled ENCE across both maps, demonstrating why his departure from the Finnish squad remains one of CS:GO’s most debated roster moves.
Aleksib’s Calculated Aggression
Beyond securing eliminations, Aleksib prioritized creating highlight-worthy moments that would demoralize his opponents. His approach combined tactical precision with psychological warfare, targeting key ENCE players in spectacular fashion.
During the decisive Overpass rounds, Aleksib executed a maneuver that immediately drew comparisons to Marcelo “coldzera” David’s legendary jumping AWP kill from MLG Columbus 2016. The sequence began with a mid-air elimination of Jani “Aerial” Jussila, followed by another acrobatic shot against Sami “xseveN” Laasanen, culminating in a knife finish that sealed OG’s victory.
In his post-match discussion with HLTV, Aleksib acknowledged the personal significance of facing his former teammates. “The preparation for this specific matchup exceeded our standard routines,” he revealed. “Every professional who experiences similar circumstances understands the additional motivation driving these performances.”
Statistical Dominance Breakdown
Aleksib’s performance transcended flashy plays, delivering one of the most complete statistical showings by an in-game leader in recent memory. His 91.3% KAST (Kill, Assist, Survive, Trade) percentage represents near-perfect round involvement, a rarity for players balancing strategic leadership with individual execution.
The comprehensive statistical profile reveals why analysts consider this among the early contenders for individual map performance of the year:
- 1.61 Rating on Overpass (1.22 over two maps)
- 2.1 K/D (21/8/10 KDA)
- Threw 26 flashes, the most on both teams
- Blinded enemies for 3.33 seconds on average
- Had 7 2-kill rounds, leading the server in that category
For context, KAST percentages above 85% typically indicate exceptional performance, while Aleksib’s 91.3% places him in elite company. His flashbang effectiveness—averaging 3.33 seconds of blind time per throw—demonstrates sophisticated utility usage that created numerous advantageous situations for his teammates.
The victory carried additional satisfaction as Miikka “suNny” Kemppi, Aleksib’s replacement on ENCE, struggled significantly throughout the series. The Finnish rifler posted a 23-47 kill-death ratio with 60.4 average damage per round, struggling to find impact against OG’s coordinated defenses.
ENCE’s collective performance highlighted deeper issues, with veteran sniper Aleksi “allu” Jalli standing as the sole player maintaining positive statistics. This contrast between Aleksib’s dominance and his replacement’s struggles underscored the strategic implications of ENCE’s roster decision.
The ICE Challenge exemplifies how smaller tournaments benefit from CS:GO’s crowded competitive calendar. With organizations like ENCE and mousesports participating between premier events, these competitions maintain competitive intensity while providing developing teams valuable stage experience.
For aspiring in-game leaders studying this matchup, key takeaways include the importance of emotional control in high-stakes situations and how strategic preparation can translate into individual dominance. Much like mastering Class Guide in tactical shooters, understanding when to employ aggressive plays versus maintaining disciplined positioning separates elite performers from competent players.
Action Checklist
- Analyze KAST percentages to evaluate round impact consistency
- Study utility usage patterns from professional matches
- Review post-match interviews for psychological preparation insights
- Compare individual performances against replacement players in grudge matches
- Document highlight plays for future strategic reference and analysis
No reproduction without permission：Game Guides Online » OG’s Aleksib gets revenge on former team ENCE for 2019 release Aleksib's dominant revenge performance against ENCE showcases elite IGL skills and statistical excellence