A practical guide for Overwatch 2 teams to support tank players and improve synergy, featuring actionable strategies and common pitfalls to avoid
The Tank Blaming Epidemic: Why It Happens
Overwatch 2’s competitive environment often singles out tank players for criticism, even when they execute their role effectively. This phenomenon stems from several psychological and gameplay factors that teams should understand.
Tank specialists receive disproportionate criticism despite solid performance in Overwatch 2, with players advocating for teammates to recognize that countering opposing compositions involves the entire squad.
Unless you exclusively compete against AI opponents in Overwatch 2, you’ve likely experienced blame from teammates following a lost engagement, regardless of your selected hero or position. This unpleasant dynamic emerges naturally when five strangers coordinate under pressure, though certain patterns amplify the issue.
Community observation confirms tank players experience this criticism most frequently. While veteran players recognize this pattern, recent discussions among damage-focused players have highlighted the unfairness of expecting tanks to solve all team problems alone.
The Reddit Awakening: DPS Players Defend Tank Role
A player with over 800 hours specializing in damage roles articulated that DPS players must compensate when the tank faces multiple counters from opposing team members.
“Frustration mounts when teammates criticize tanks performing excellently while three enemies adapt specifically to counter them.”
They clarified that when tanks receive focused punishment mid-match despite effective play, they demonstrate role understanding while facing exceptional pressure. At this juncture, damage dealers should select counters to reduce pressure, enabling tanks to function more efficiently. Constantly switching tank heroes typically harms overall team cohesion.
Overwatch 2 apologizes after permabanning player for calling someone a “noob”
Marvel Rivals has a tank problem and the solution is so simple
Marvel Rivals player sick of hero type “no one wants to play”
Practical Team Strategies: Beyond Tank Switching
Other competitors supported this perspective in discussion threads, though some responses humorously addressed players expecting tanks to single-handedly secure victories.
One participant noted that solo tank composition doesn’t translate to “one tank versus their counterpart” in isolation.
“I detest when players automatically declare ‘our tank gets countered’… what’s your contribution? Why must they exclusively handle this situation?” they emphasized.
“Completely agree. This applies to support players too,” added another contributor. They elaborated that when enemies deploy Mauga / Roadhog alongside Bastion and Reaper against your Reinhardt / Winston, this creates perfect conditions for Double Sniper compositions with Ana and Zenyatta, given the absence of dive threats.
Similarly, when opponents select Zarya, Mei, and Symmetra to counter your D.Va; “This scenario becomes ideal for Pharah / Echo / Mercy combinations since they lack hitscan specialists!”
Practical Tip: When enemies commit multiple heroes to counter your tank, they create vulnerabilities elsewhere. A team running three tank-counters often lacks anti-air capabilities, creating opportunities for aerial compositions. Similarly, heavy close-range focus often leaves long sightlines undefended.
Strategy Implementation: Instead of demanding tank switches, propose specific team adaptations: “They’re all focusing our tank – let’s try Pharah-Mercy to exploit their lack of hitscan” or “Their whole comp counters Reinhardt – we could run snipers since they can’t dive us.”
Common Mistakes That Destroy Team Morale
Teams frequently undermine their own success through predictable errors in handling tank pressure situations. Recognizing these patterns can prevent unnecessary losses and reduce toxicity.
Mistake #1: The Solo Tank Expectation
Assuming the tank must independently solve all team problems ignores fundamental Overwatch 2 mechanics. Each role possesses tools to alleviate pressure – DPS can eliminate threats, supports can provide sustain, and off-angles can create space.
Mistake #2: Ignoring Counter Opportunities
When enemies deploy three heroes to counter your tank, they inevitably weaken other areas. Failing to exploit these gaps represents missed winning conditions. Teams should actively discuss which enemy weaknesses appear and who can best capitalize.
Mistake #3: Destructive Communication Patterns
“Tank diff” comments or demanding switches without offering solutions demoralizes teammates. Constructive alternatives include: “They’re countering you hard – what heroes would help us most?” or “I can swap to [hero] to help with [problem].”
Mistake #4: Timing Misjudgments
Switching tanks during ultimate charge buildup wastes valuable resources. Sometimes enduring counter pressure for 30 seconds while building a game-changing ultimate proves wiser than immediate swapping.
Advanced Optimization: Pro-Level Team Adjustments
High-level play involves sophisticated responses to tank-countering strategies. These approaches separate competent teams from truly coordinated squads.
Reading Enemy Composition Intentions
Recognize when enemies commit excessive resources to counter your tank. Three heroes focusing one role leaves other areas vulnerable. Communicate these vulnerabilities: “They have no dive,” “No hitscan,” or “All close-range.”
Staggered Adaptation Timing
Instead of simultaneous switches, coordinate staggered adaptations. The support might swap first to enable tank survival, followed by DPS changes once new sustain patterns establish. This prevents the “we all switched and now have zero synergy” problem.
Resource Allocation Shifts
When tanks face multiple counters, redirect resources. Supports might allocate more healing, DPS might focus countering enemies first, or teams might adopt more defensive positioning until adaptations complete.
Ultimate Economy Considerations
Evaluate ultimate charge status before demanding switches. A tank at 90% ultimate charge might provide more value by building that final 10% rather than switching to a zero-charge alternative.
Pocketing Strategy Adjustments
Temporary pocketing (dedicated support focus) can enable tanks to weather counter periods until teammates adapt. This “bridge strategy” works well when damage dealers need time to identify optimal counters.
Personal Experience: The Tank Perspective
These players present compelling arguments overall. Overwatch 2 functions as a team-based experience where victory typically requires selecting compositions with superior synergy and counter capabilities. Expecting one teammate (the tank) to exclusively switch heroes represents unfair burden distribution.
As an occasional tank player, I understand this frustration firsthand—selecting D.Va and receiving switch demands despite absorbing Graviton Surges or Hanzo dragons and consistently blocking enemy Ana biotic grenades. Meanwhile, damage dealers refusing to counter-swap insist I change simply because opponents include a Zarya.
Success emerges from collective effort; ultimately, supporting your tank rather than criticizing them produces remarkable improvements.
The Reality Check: Effective tanking involves more than statistics. A tank might have mediocre damage numbers but consistently block key abilities, create space at perfect moments, or draw multiple enemies away from objectives. These contributions often appear in win/loss columns rather than scoreboards.
Team Trust Development: When teams trust their tank’s hero selection and adapt around it, they frequently outperform teams that force constant switches. This trust develops through communication about intended strategies and willingness to experiment with complementary picks.
No reproduction without permission：Game Guides Online » Overwatch 2 DPS mains call for players to stop blaming their tank A practical guide for Overwatch 2 teams to support tank players and improve synergy, featuring actionable strategies and common pitfalls to avoid