TL;DR
- SK Gaming faces dual allegations of contract deception and sexual abuse within its academy system
- Players waited months for promised contracts and salaries that never materialized
- Unequal support structure created tiered system favoring only top-performing teams
- Industry experts confirm this reflects broader systemic problems in esports
- Regulatory bodies have yet to address the specific allegations publicly
One of esports’ most established organizations confronts disturbing accusations from former developmental players, highlighting persistent industry-wide challenges.
A team manager identified as “Vivi” from SK Gaming Academy has come forward with detailed claims about the organization misleading young talent through unfulfilled contractual commitments and inadequate support structures.
SK Academy- the drama you´ve been waiting for
Read:
https://t.co/UtbSHXt4lq— Viviii (@Vivitortellini)
August 15, 2021
According to Vivi’s detailed account, SK Gaming systematically delayed formalizing agreements with academy players despite repeated assurances. The organization provided sample contracts in August 2020 as proof of their intentions, yet failed to execute binding documents through seven months of continuous postponements.
Management offered shifting explanations for the delays, including budgetary uncertainty, unavailable decision-makers, and legal complications. These excuses persisted until March 2021, by which time affected competitors had already completed two competitive splits without compensation or contractual security.
Practical tip for aspiring esports professionals: Always secure written contracts before committing significant time to any organization, regardless of their reputation or promises.
Vivi’s testimony reveals SK Gaming Academy operated as a three-team developmental network supporting the main SK Gaming Prime roster. This structure created inherent inequalities where only the highest-performing squad received organizational backing.
The selected team enjoyed privileges including boot camp access at SK’s Berlin headquarters, while the remaining two groups received neither financial support nor developmental resources despite operating under the same branding.
Common mistake: Many organizations create tiered academy systems without establishing clear pathways or equal treatment standards, leading to disillusionment among developing talent.
Hahaha at the start, the starting head coach sexually molested me btw and i was 15 years old and he was 21? btwwwwwww XD still a lot in the unknown ✌️
— Sneaby (@SneabyADC)
August 15, 2021
Alongside contractual issues, a former SK Gaming Academy player came forward with disturbing allegations of sexual assault by a former coach. The accuser was only 15 years old at the time, while the coach was approximately 21, creating concerning power dynamics.
It remains unclear whether SK Gaming management received reports about these incidents when they occurred or learned about them subsequently. The organization has maintained public silence regarding both the contractual and abuse allegations.
Time estimate for resolution: Industry experts suggest such complex cases typically require 3-6 months for thorough investigation and resolution.
SK Gaming controversy unfortunately common in esports
The pattern of organizations making empty promises to players and staff represents a systemic issue plaguing competitive gaming. Numerous esports entities face similar accusations of exploiting talent through contractual deception and inadequate support.
Recent high-profile cases include the Ninjas in Pyjamas controversy, where professional competitors, organizational personnel, and content creators all reported mistreatment and unfulfilled commitments.
Optimization tip for organizations: Implement transparent contract processes and establish independent reporting channels to prevent such issues.
I can’t speak to this specific situation in EU, but, in my short time as LCSPA ED, I have dealt with multiple instances of players in amateur playing with the promise of a contract and pay but nothing in writing. We helped fix that.
Shape up and pay up, or get out of our space.
https://t.co/Qviu16TDSa— Phillip Aram (@Phillip_Aram)
August 15, 2021
LCS Players Association executive director Phillip Aram addressed the broader implications, confirming these practices represent common challenges across the competitive gaming landscape.
Thus far, neither Riot Games nor LEC officials have publicly commented on the specific allegations against SK Gaming, highlighting regulatory gaps in addressing such issues promptly.
In-depth analysis: The absence of standardized contract enforcement mechanisms in developmental esports creates environments where young players remain vulnerable to exploitation.
Action Checklist
- Always demand written contracts before committing to any competitive engagement
- Document all communications regarding payments, promises, and contractual terms
- Research organization history and reputation through multiple sources
- Establish clear reporting channels for any misconduct or contractual issues
- Consult with player associations or legal advisors when encountering red flags
No reproduction without permission：Game Guides Online » SK Gaming accused of not paying developmental players, coaches SK Gaming faces serious contract and misconduct allegations highlighting esports industry systemic issues