Some CSGO talents boycott BLAST over partnership with NEOM

The esports world faces another ethical crisis as BLAST Premier’s Counter-Strike: Global Offensive tournament series announced a strategic partnership with NEOM, triggering immediate backlash from prominent community figures. Several top-tier CSGO commentators and analysts have publicly declared they will no longer collaborate with BLAST events due to the controversial alliance.

This situation mirrors a nearly identical controversy that unfolded in the League of Legends European Championship (LEC). When Riot Games’ European competitive circuit partnered with NEOM, professional talent similarly protested, accusing organizers of engaging in what they termed “fake activism.” The LEC ultimately terminated their NEOM agreement following internal pressure.

Vance Hill, Frankie Ward, Harry Russell, and Hugo Bryon have collectively withdrawn from upcoming BLAST competitions. Their unified stance cites NEOM’s documented mistreatment of indigenous populations and systematic discrimination against LGBTQ+ individuals.

“The BLAST and NEOM collaboration represents a significant stain on the BLAST brand identity, which I know comprises many exceptional, skilled, and compassionate people. The notion that ethical concerns could be suppressed through deliberate ignorance establishes a dangerous precedent,” Russell stated in his social media declaration.

I stand with my peers and coworkers in affirming that I will not participate in BLAST events while this partnership continues. This ethical dilemma will not simply fade from memory.

I profoundly respect the bravery demonstrated by BLAST-affiliated individuals who voiced opposition early in this process. Your principles are supported and valued ❤️????

— JustHarry (@JustHarryGG)August 5, 2020

Bryon emphasized the critical need for comprehensive education regarding NEOM’s extensive human rights abuses. Documented incidents include the systematic demolition of indigenous settlements and forced evictions from ancestral territories, according to investigative reporting from The Guardian. Additionally, NEOM faces allegations of orchestrating the killings of protest leaders who resisted their development initiatives.

The BLAST and NEOM agreement presents an essential learning opportunity to ensure we cease collaborating with entities that would potentially harm our colleagues and community members.https://t.co/OY5lnFtcVK

— Frankie (@FrankieWard)August 5, 2020

The protesting CSGO professionals further highlighted Saudi Arabia’s government-enforced anti-LGBTQ legislation. These laws explicitly prohibit same-gender relationships and criminalize wearing attire deemed inappropriate for one’s assigned gender at birth. The comprehensive US Department of State Human Rights Report confirms that consensual same-sex intimate conduct may result in punishments ranging from public flogging to execution in Saudi Arabia.

“I want to emphasize that certain nations legally prosecute individuals to the extent of capital punishment for non-heterosexual orientation,” Ward clarified when questioned about her refusal to work with BLAST regarding the partnership.

“Saudi Arabia’s state security apparatus published a video recently on an official government social media platform that categorized feminism, homosexuality and atheism as ideologies constituting forms of ‘extremism.'”https://t.co/0zgaIsL538

— FFRF (@FFRF)November 14, 2019

Understanding the severity of these human rights concerns requires examining the broader geopolitical context. Saudi Arabia’s legal framework remains among the world’s most restrictive regarding gender expression and sexual orientation, creating genuine safety concerns for LGBTQ+ esports professionals and community members.

The collective action by CSGO talent represents a growing trend of social consciousness within competitive gaming communities. Professionals are increasingly weighing ethical considerations alongside career opportunities, establishing new standards for corporate responsibility in esports.

Industry analysts note this boycott follows established patterns of talent-led activism that previously influenced major gaming organizations. The successful LEC reversal demonstrates that coordinated professional resistance can effect meaningful change in partnership decisions.

Community response has been predominantly supportive of the protesting talent, with social media platforms witnessing widespread endorsement of their ethical stance. This public backing strengthens their negotiating position and amplifies the message to tournament organizers.

The timing of these withdrawals creates significant production challenges for BLAST events, potentially affecting broadcast quality and viewer experience. The organization must now balance business partnerships against operational viability and community trust.

For those navigating similar ethical dilemmas in gaming, our BF6 Class Selection Guide discusses how to maintain principles while advancing in competitive environments.

This controversy extends beyond individual partnerships to fundamental questions about esports’ ethical foundations. As the industry matures, stakeholders increasingly demand alignment between business decisions and human rights principles.

Tournament organizers face increasing pressure to conduct thorough due diligence on potential partners’ human rights records. The NEOM situation illustrates how previously acceptable business practices now face intense scrutiny from both professionals and audiences.

Practical considerations for esports organizations include implementing ethical partnership vetting processes, establishing clear human rights policies, and creating transparent communication channels with talent and community representatives.

Those interested in comprehensive gaming industry analysis should consult our Battlefield 6 Complete Guide for insights into evolving standards.

The ongoing situation demonstrates the growing influence of content creators and commentators in shaping esports governance. Their collective actions establish precedents that will influence future partnership decisions across the competitive gaming landscape.

As this develops, the community awaits BLAST’s formal response and potential policy adjustments. The outcome will likely set important precedents for how esports organizations balance commercial interests against social responsibility.

No reproduction without permission：Game Guides Online » Some CSGO talents boycott BLAST over partnership with NEOM CSGO talent boycott BLAST over NEOM partnership citing human rights violations and LGBTQ+ discrimination