TL;DR
- G2 Esports faces favorable Group A matchups but must address early-game weaknesses
- Jungle meta favors JD Gaming and DAMWON in Group B’s high-stakes competition
- Group C features legendary bottom lane talent with Gen.G and Fnatic as safest picks
- TOP Esports dominates Group D through mid lane superiority and roster depth
- Focus on team consistency and meta adaptation for optimal Pick’em success
This comprehensive guide covers the Worlds 2020 group stage predictions. For detailed analysis of quarterfinals and playoffs matchups, check our advanced tournament coverage!
With the Play-In stage concluded, the main event of the 2020 World Championship promises intense competition and strategic depth for esports enthusiasts.
The current reward structure differs significantly from previous years, offering primarily a Pick’em Poro Prophet Icon for top performers. Despite the simplified incentives, mastering Pick’ems remains the ultimate test of League of Legends strategic knowledge and predictive accuracy.
This year’s main event showcases both established powerhouse organizations and exciting newcomers. Many competitors are making their international debut, presenting unique challenges for informed prediction making.
Our expert analysis provides the strategic framework needed to excel in your Worlds 2020 Pick’em selections.
G2 Esports gets an easy ride in 2020 World Championships
- G2 Esports
- Team Liquid
- Suning
- Machi Esports
Group A presents G2 Esports with arguably their most favorable international draw in recent memory. Among the LPL representatives, Suning appears most vulnerable due to their comparative lack of star power, though they maintain respectable consistency throughout matches.
Consistency emerges as the defining characteristic for Group A success. G2’s well-documented early game struggles and occasional late-game objective focus lapses create exploitable weaknesses that opponents will certainly target.
Team Liquid demonstrated remarkable improvement during play-ins, showcasing both strategic discipline and mechanical execution that exceeded expectations. Their ability to secure favorable draft compositions and execute clean macro strategies positions them strongly for advancement.
Machi Esports represents the group’s primary wild card. The impressive performance of fellow PCS representative PSG Talon during play-ins, despite fielding predominantly substitute players, suggests Machi could deliver unexpected results against established opponents.
Better jungle will win Group B
- JD Gaming
- DAMWON Gaming
- Rogue
- PSG Talon
The current competitive meta heavily favors hyper-carry jungle champions, making Group B particularly intriguing given its concentration of elite jungling talent. JD Gaming’s position as group favorites appears justified when analyzing team compositions and strategic approaches.
Seo “Kanavi” Jin-hyeok has established himself as the world’s premier jungler, consistently delivering carry performances that single-handedly secure victories for his team.
DAMWON Gaming underwent significant stylistic evolution following their Mid-Season Cup experience against LPL competition. Their unique position within the LCK stems from their aggressive, fight-oriented approach that contrasts with traditional Korean strategic patience.
Rogue faces monumental challenges against the group’s top contenders. While capable of competitive performances, the European squad lacks the consistent firepower needed to overcome JDG and DAMWON’s superior individual talent and coordinated play.
PSG Talon achieved remarkable success during play-ins despite roster limitations. However, their placement in arguably the tournament’s most difficult group severely limits their advancement prospects without exceptional performances.
Group C is the battle of the legacies
- Gen.G
- Fnatic
- TSM
- LGD Gaming
Group C assembles four iconic esports organizations each carrying significant competitive baggage. Fnatic seeks redemption after consecutive LEC finals losses, TSM returned to their championship roster for Worlds qualification, and Gen.G pursues their first major victory since organizational rebranding.
The group’s defining narrative centers around legendary bottom lane talent. Yiliang “Doublelift” Peng, Park “Ruler” Jae-hyuk, and Martin “Rekkles” Larsson represent three of the most accomplished AD carries in competitive history.
LGD Gaming enters the main event following inconsistent play-in performances. Their demonstrated struggles in best-of-one formats significantly hinder their chances against more established opponents in this competitive group.
Domestic results and current meta analysis strongly favor Gen.G and Fnatic as the most reliable advancement selections.
TOP Esports the undisputed king in group D
- TOP Esports
- DRX
- Unicorns of Love
- FlyQuest
Group D’s outcome will largely depend on mid lane matchups, where TOP Esports holds distinct advantages. The presence of elite ADC Yu “JackeyLove” Wen-Bo combined with roster-wide competency makes TES the undeniable favorite for top position.
DRX presents an intriguing case study in competitive inconsistency. At their peak performance level, they compete with the world’s best teams, but their performance volatility creates significant advancement uncertainty.
FlyQuest’s primary strength lies in their roster stability and methodical gameplay approach. While lacking flashy individual plays, their disciplined approach minimizes critical errors that often decide close matches.
Unicorns of Love finally secured main event qualification after multiple attempts. Their upset potential against volatile opponents like DRX and FlyQuest cannot be discounted, though third place represents their most realistic achievement.
Strategic Pick’em success requires understanding team-specific tendencies and meta adaptations. Common mistakes include overvaluing regional performance without considering international experience factors.
Advanced players should analyze champion priority trends and draft flexibility when making predictions. Teams demonstrating adaptability across multiple strategic approaches typically achieve better tournament results than one-dimensional squads.
Timing considerations prove crucial for optimal Pick’em performance. The Group Stage selection window opens September 30 at 4 PM PT and closes October 2 at 11 PM PT, requiring timely decision-making based on the latest competitive intelligence.
Risk management involves balancing safe picks with strategic gambles on underperforming teams with high upside potential.
Action Checklist
- Analyze team-specific early game performance metrics and objective control patterns
- Review jungle meta adaptations and champion priority trends across regions
- Evaluate roster stability and international experience factors for each team
- Balance safe predictions with calculated risks on potential upset candidates
- Submit picks before October 2 deadline at 11 PM PT
No reproduction without permission：Game Guides Online » The best Worlds 2020 Pick Em predictions Expert analysis and strategic insights for mastering your Worlds 2020 Pick'em predictions