Valorant anti-cheat could be a serious security risk for players

Mutahar Anas from SomeOrdinaryGamers has raised significant alarms about Valorant’s Vanguard anti-cheat system, highlighting potential security vulnerabilities that could compromise user privacy and system integrity.

The gaming community faces a critical dilemma: balancing competitive integrity against potential privacy invasions. Vanguard’s design choices represent one of the most aggressive anti-cheat approaches in modern gaming.

Understanding these security implications is essential for every Valorant player concerned about their digital safety.

Riot Games developed Vanguard as a mandatory kernel-level anti-cheat solution that integrates deeply with Windows operating systems. This approach grants the software unprecedented system access privileges.

The vgk.sys driver activates during system startup, operating before most user applications load. This boot-time execution strategy aims to prevent cheat software from gaining priority access.

Kernel-level access means Vanguard operates at the highest privilege ring (Ring 0), giving it capabilities similar to operating system components and security software.

Security researchers compare this access level to rootkit functionality, though Riot maintains it’s implemented responsibly. The fundamental concern remains: any software with this level of access could potentially be exploited by malicious actors.

For players concerned about system security, understanding kernel-level operations is crucial. This access allows monitoring of all running processes and system activities, creating both anti-cheat advantages and security risks.

Riot’s official stance maintains that Vanguard doesn’t collect or transmit user data to their servers. However, the absence of independent verification mechanisms creates a trust-based relationship between company and users.

The critical privacy issue centers on verifiability. Without transparent audit processes or open-source components, players must rely entirely on Riot’s assurances about data handling practices.

Historical context adds complexity to these trust considerations. Riot’s parent company Tencent, and their collaborations with various institutions, raise legitimate questions about data governance and privacy protection standards.

Privacy-conscious gamers should consider that kernel-level access theoretically enables extensive data collection capabilities, regardless of whether those capabilities are currently utilized.

The most significant security risk involves potential third-party exploitation. If vulnerabilities exist within Vanguard’s code, malicious hackers could potentially leverage these weaknesses to compromise user systems.

Security researchers emphasize that any software operating at kernel level becomes an attractive target for exploitation attempts. The higher the privilege level, the more valuable successful exploitation becomes for attackers.

Transparency remains a key concern. Requests for public vulnerability audit reports have gone unaddressed, preventing independent security assessment of the anti-cheat system’s robustness.

Riot’s development team acknowledges these concerns while defending their approach. As one developer stated: “We consider this an essential component in combating cheating… if our security measures prove counterproductive we’ll replace them with alternatives.”

The company maintains that boot-time driver implementation represents their current optimal solution, while committing to continuous monitoring and potential future adjustments.

The gaming community continues expressing significant concerns about Vanguard’s implementation. Many players remain unsatisfied with Riot’s explanations and reassurances regarding privacy and security implications.

Despite ongoing monitoring and potential future adjustments, no official announcements indicate imminent changes to Vanguard’s fundamental architecture or operational methodology.

For players navigating these concerns, practical security measures include regular system updates, cautious software installation habits, and monitoring system performance for unusual behavior that might indicate security issues.

The situation highlights broader industry tensions between competitive integrity and user privacy. As anti-cheat technologies evolve, balancing these competing priorities remains challenging for developers and concerning for players.

No reproduction without permission：Game Guides Online » Valorant anti-cheat could be a serious security risk for players Understanding Valorant's Vanguard anti-cheat security concerns and privacy implications for gamers