TL;DR
- Zven is officially signed to Cloud9 but cannot play Academy stage games due to import restrictions
- Cloud9 uses all three import slots between LCS and Academy rosters
- Zven participates in scrims but Calvin ‘K1ng’ Truong handles official matches
- Import rules balance native talent development vs. roster strength optimization
- The situation highlights strategic roster management challenges in professional esports

Jesper “Zven” Svenningsen maintains an active contract with Cloud9’s League of Legends division, though his competitive participation faces significant limitations. The veteran European marksman finds himself in an unusual position where organizational commitment doesn’t translate to competitive availability.
Cloud9 publicly confirmed Zven’s inclusion in their Academy program, yet subsequent roster reveals omitted his name entirely. This discrepancy stems from Riot Games’ import regulations governing both LCS and Academy competitions, creating a complex roster management scenario.
Is Zven on Cloud9?
While formally contracted to Cloud9’s League operations, Zven remains ineligible for Academy official matches due to the organization exhausting its three permitted import slots. Cloud9 disclosed this strategic decision through a sponsored video presentation of their Academy lineup, where head coach Nick “LS” de Cesare attributed the limitation to what he characterized as Riot’s diminished prioritization of Academy-level competition.
Many industry observers contend that restricting major region imports in North America’s developmental circuit reasonably protects opportunities for domestic talent cultivation. Regardless of perspective, Cloud9’s tactical approach involves substituting Zven during Academy competitions, deploying Calvin “K1ng” Truong for Riot-sanctioned league matches while retaining Zven for extensive scrimmage sessions and practice regimens.
Are Cross-League Import Restrictions Fair?
Riot’s regulatory framework for inter-league imports presents organizations with calculated trade-offs between developmental objectives and competitive ambitions. The policy’s primary benefit involves reserving roster positions for North American prospects to develop within the competitive ecosystem, though this comes at the cost of potentially constraining Academy team strength through limited international talent access.
Cloud9’s current predicament exemplifies the practical consequences of these regulations. With two new imports on their primary LCS roster consuming available slots, the organization cannot legally field Zven in official Academy competitions despite his contractual status and practice participation.
This regulatory environment demands sophisticated roster architecture from organizations balancing immediate competitive needs with long-term talent development. Teams must strategically allocate import slots between primary and Academy rosters while navigating the complex interplay between competitive aspirations and league compliance requirements.
The situation raises important questions about player career trajectories and organizational resource allocation in professional esports. For aspiring professionals studying competitive gaming dynamics, understanding these structural constraints provides crucial context for strategic decision-making frameworks applicable across different esports titles.
Zven’s ambiguous position between active roster member and competitive spectator highlights systemic challenges within professional esports ecosystems. Organizations face difficult decisions regarding player development, import allocation, and competitive optimization under constrained regulatory conditions.
Professional gamers navigating similar situations should consider several strategic factors: contractual guarantees for practice participation, clear communication about competitive availability, and understanding how import regulations impact long-term career planning. Similar strategic considerations apply when working through progression systems in other competitive games.
The import restriction debate reflects broader tensions in esports between regional development and global competition. While limitations protect domestic talent pipelines, they may also inhibit the highest levels of competitive play in developmental leagues.
For players aiming to optimize their competitive careers, understanding these structural dynamics proves essential. Just as mastering specialized roles requires understanding game mechanics, navigating professional esports demands comprehension of regulatory frameworks and organizational strategies.
Zven’s future with Cloud9 remains uncertain, representing the complex intersection of player talent, organizational strategy, and league regulations in modern esports.
Action Checklist
- Review import regulations for any league before signing contracts
- Clarify practice vs. competition participation in contractual agreements
- Understand how cross-league roster rules impact team composition
- Develop backup plans for scenarios where regulatory constraints limit competitive opportunities
No reproduction without permission:Game Guides Online » Why is Zven not playing for Cloud9 in the LCS? Understanding Zven's Cloud9 Academy role and Riot's import restriction policies in LCS esports
