Was this Fnatic’s worst split ever?

TL;DR

  • Fnatic achieved historic success as Season 1 World Champions and dominated early EU LCS with multiple consecutive split victories
  • The 2023 roster featured proven veterans and promising talent but collapsed to 9th place in LEC Winter Split
  • 2023 represents Fnatic’s worst domestic performance in organization history
  • Key franchise players like Rekkles and sOAZ defined Fnatic’s golden era of European dominance
  • Current crisis requires fundamental roster reevaluation ten years after league qualification

Rekkles Fnatic 2023

As one of Europe’s foundational esports organizations, Fnatic holds the distinguished title of first-ever League of Legends World Champions. Yet their current competitive freefall raises critical questions about whether 2023 represents their most disastrous competitive year in franchise history.

Throughout their storied legacy, Fnatic became synonymous with championship excellence and repeated domestic dominance within Europe’s LEC ecosystem. The organization boasts multiple regional championship victories and consistent international appearances at premier tournaments including Worlds and MSI. Despite recent flashes of competitive brilliance and tournament successes, the current season has delivered unprecedented struggles that demand historical context and analytical perspective.

By examining Fnatic’s complete competitive timeline from their championship origins through current challenges, we can identify the root causes of their decline and assess potential recovery pathways for this legendary franchise.

Fnatic maintains their unique status as the sole North American or European organization to capture a World Championship-level tournament victory. Their inaugural championship roster featuring xPeke, Cyanide, Shushei, LaMiaZIt, and Mellisan achieved victory at Riot’s first officially sanctioned international competition during 2011. This landmark tournament represented Fnatic’s competitive debut in professional League of Legends with a structured team composition. Few organizations have experienced such an immediate competitive peak at their competitive inception.

This foundational championship achievement carries significant contextual qualifications within the broader League of Legends community perspective. With competitive powerhouses from China and Korea absent from this prototype Worlds format, many analysts question its legitimacy as a truly global competitive victory. Given that every subsequent World Championship has been secured by Eastern region teams, these contextual reservations hold substantial analytical merit.


While Fnatic’s competitive emergence delivered immediate impact, the competitive scale and significance of a Season 1 Championship victory differs substantially from contemporary Worlds tournament achievements. During the transitional period preceding 2013, Fnatic competed within League of Legends’ open circuit structure that characterized the era’s competitive landscape. Early 2013 marked Riot Games’ strategic implementation of structured, company-controlled competitive ecosystems through establishment of leagues including LCS and LEC, originally branded as EU LCS. The 2013 EU LCS Qualifier established competitive brackets pairing pre-selected teams, with match victors earning invitations into the newly-formed competitive league.

Fnatic secured their league position by defeating Meet Your Makers 2-0, joining Giants Underdoges, Copenhagen Wolves, and Season 1 Championship finals opponents Against All Authority as charter EU LCS members. This foundational moment established Fnatic’s competitive trajectory of regular splits, playoff competitions, and international tournament schedules that define contemporary esports. From this competitive milestone forward, Fnatic began establishing their reputation as Europe’s premier competitive organization.

Fnatic immediately launched an extended period of competitive supremacy following their LEC integration. Their inaugural competitive roster comprised sOAZ, Cyanide, xPeke, YelloWStar, and nRated. The organization rapidly ascended to competitive pinnacle positions during both 2013 Spring Split and Summer Split competitions, securing first-place finishes in both inaugural splits. Spring 2014 continued this dominant competitive pattern with another decisive first-place championship performance for Fnatic. Europe’s initial three competitive splits featured a single dominant champion organization: Fnatic.

This competitive foundation established organizational expectations that Fnatic would consistently contend for Europe’s premier team status throughout subsequent competitive years. During this foundational period, bot lane specialist Martin “Rekkles” Larsson joined the roster as their emerging prodigious damage-per-second talent. Rekkles evolved into one of Fnatic’s enduring franchise cornerstone players across multiple competitive seasons, alongside French top lane veteran and original Fnatic competitor sOAZ. These two players specifically served as foundational competitive talents during crucial developmental years of European League of Legends competitive growth. Summer 2014 delivered a narrow competitive defeat against Alliance, Spring 2015 secured another domestic championship victory over Unicorns of Love, with Summer 2015 repeating this championship pattern against Alliance.

2016 revealed initial competitive vulnerabilities during Fnatic’s EU LCS competitive tenure. Third-place finishes in Spring Split and Regional Finals during spring of that competitive year. For the initial instance across three competitive years, Fnatic appeared diminished from their previous status as Europe’s perennial dominant champions. Throughout this competitive transition, sOAZ and Rekkles remained roster constants and consistent contributing factors in Fnatic’s competitive successes. Prior to that competitive year, no organizations could realistically challenge Fnatic’s established competitive legacy within the European ecosystem.

Fnatic’s 2023 competitive roster featured exceptional talent density, historical significance, and competitive potential. Top lane specialist Martin “Wunder” Hansen brought proven veteran experience from G2 Esports, widely regarded as Europe’s greatest domestic top lane competitor historically. Jungle specialist Ivan “Razork” Martin established reputation for aggressive gameplay patterns and creating strategic advantages for teammates. Mid-lane competitor Marek “Humanoid” Brazda earned recognition as exceptional performer during previous team tenures. Bot lane configuration featuring returning veteran Rekkles and emerging Worlds substitute Ruben “Rhuckz” Brazda possessed substantial competitive upside potential.

With multiple experienced competitors, each recognized for carry potential capabilities, combined with aggressive jungle specialist to establish gold advantage scenarios for these players, the roster composition appeared strategically optimized for competitive success. The competitive community found it difficult to envision scenarios where this roster composition would fail to achieve competitive relevance under optimal conditions. As competitive records demonstrate, however, optimal conditions failed to materialize.


Fnatic plummeted to 9th competitive position during LEC Winter Split. This competitive outcome positioned Fnatic among two teams excluded from Group Stage advancement beyond regular split competition. The performance represented not merely suboptimal results but complete competitive catastrophe. Both organizational leadership and veteran competitor Rekkles issued formal apologies acknowledging disappointing competitive performances.

Regarding competitive placement within European regular split history, 2023 established Fnatic’s worst-ever domestic competitive performance. The organization’s previous competitive nadir occurred during EU LCS’ 2016 Spring Split. Analytical assessment requires acknowledging that Fnatic demonstrated inferior competitive form during this year’s inception compared to any previous competitive period. Winter split concluded for the organization, presenting immediate strategic challenges regarding roster reconstruction for a team composition designed for competitive success.

What appeared positioned as competitive resurgence instead transformed into organizational rock bottom exactly one decade following league qualification. Optimistic projections for Fnatic’s competitive roster have been comprehensively invalidated by this split’s outcomes. The critical strategic question involves whether organizational leadership pursues comprehensive rebuild strategies, repeated competitive attempts, or intermediate strategic approaches.

Action Checklist

  • Analyze roster composition synergy and role compatibility across positions
  • Review historical split performance data for comparative context
  • Assess coaching staff strategies and draft phase decision-making patterns
  • Evaluate player performance metrics against historical benchmarks
  • Monitor organizational decision timelines for roster changes and strategic adjustments

No reproduction without permission:Game Guides Online » Was this Fnatic’s worst split ever? Analyzing Fnatic's historic 2023 LEC collapse through their championship legacy and roster dynamics