TL;DR
- 11-year-old Valorant Radiant player Lucas banned for violating Twitch’s 13+ age policy
- Community divided despite parental supervision during streams
- Twitch maintains strict enforcement of COPPA compliance requirements
- Previous temporary ban indicates ongoing policy awareness issues
- Two-year wait required before legal Twitch streaming eligibility

The gaming community faces a complex dilemma as an exceptionally talented young Valorant player encounters platform enforcement actions. An 11-year-old Brazilian prodigy known as Lucas, recognized as potentially the youngest competitor to achieve Radiant rank status, has received a permanent suspension from Twitch broadcasting services.
This situation highlights the tension between recognizing extraordinary skill and maintaining platform policy compliance. Lucas had been regularly streaming his high-level gameplay sessions, demonstrating mechanical prowess far beyond his years in Riot Games’ competitive tactical shooter.
The streaming platform’s decision has ignited passionate discussions within the Valorant community, with supporters and critics equally vocal about the appropriateness of the enforcement action.
Twitch’s Age Enforcement Policy Analysis
Twitch’s established Terms of Service explicitly mandate that account registrants must meet or exceed 13 years of age. This requirement aligns with broader digital platform standards and COPPA (Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act) compliance obligations in the United States. The platform maintains zero tolerance for underage usage regardless of mitigating circumstances.
Lucas’s situation presents a compelling case study in policy interpretation. Despite direct parental oversight during all broadcasting sessions, Twitch’s automated systems and moderation teams consistently enforce the age threshold without exceptions. This creates challenging scenarios where extraordinary talent development conflicts with legal compliance requirements.
Content creators and parents should understand that platform policies typically reference chronological age rather than maturity level or supervision arrangements. The 13-year minimum represents a bright-line rule that streaming services implement to maintain regulatory compliance across their global operations.
The young player’s journey through competitive gaming reveals several important considerations for aspiring streamers. Lucas and his family produced a detailed video explanation addressing the suspension, hoping to persuade Twitch administrators to reconsider their decision. Prominent esports commentator Jake Lucky amplified their appeal by sharing the family’s perspective across social media platforms.
Critical context emerges from the revelation that Lucas’s account had previously received a temporary suspension months earlier, indicating ongoing awareness of policy violations. The family acknowledged lacking comprehensive understanding of Twitch’s age-specific account requirements prior to the initial enforcement action.
This is Lucas, a Brazilian Valorant streamer who reached Radiant at just 11 years old
He has been banned on Twitch for his age, although he streams with parental supervision. Much of the community has jumped to his defense, while others argue Twitch’s ban is fair pic.twitter.com/E3GgX5UxMz
— Jake Lucky (@JakeSucky) November 29, 2022
This case demonstrates the importance of thoroughly reviewing platform terms before committing to content creation efforts. Many gaming families overlook detailed policy requirements when focused on skill development and community engagement opportunities.
Lucas’s narrative combines inspirational competitive achievement with sobering policy reality. Despite his remarkable abilities in one of gaming’s most demanding titles, Twitch’s regulations remain unambiguous regarding minimum age thresholds. The broadcasting prohibition applies regardless of parental presence or supervision arrangements.
Unless the platform undergoes fundamental policy restructuring regarding participant age qualifications, the company maintains complete authority to permanently restrict accounts created by individuals under 13 years old.
The situation presents broader questions about how gaming platforms might develop specialized programs for exceptionally talented younger players while maintaining legal compliance. Currently, families seeking to showcase developing talent must explore alternative platforms with different age policies or wait until meeting standard requirements.
For Lucas’s supporters hoping to witness his continued competitive evolution, the waiting period extends approximately two years before he qualifies for Twitch streaming under standard terms.
Action Checklist
- Review platform age requirements before creating accounts
- Verify parental guidance requirements for minor streamers
- Research alternative platforms with different age policies
- Document gameplay achievements for future platform applications
No reproduction without permission:Game Guides Online » Youngest Valorant Radiant player banned on Twitch Understanding Twitch's age policy enforcement and the debate around gaming prodigy Lucas's streaming ban
